For sixteen months, teams working under the Adana Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office carried out technical and physical surveillance against the group known as ‘Yıkamacılar’. Technical surveillance refers to the interception of communications and monitoring of digital traces, while physical surveillance involves officers observing movements and gathering visual evidence. The effort was not a short‑term sweep; it stretched over a year and a half, allowing investigators to map the network’s activities and connections.
During that period, investigators linked 117 individuals to 32 separate criminal acts. The alleged offenses ranged from forming an organization to commit crimes, attempted murder, and intentional injury to drug trafficking, armed threats, property damage, and qualified plunder. Each of these categories represents a distinct legal accusation that the prosecutors said could be proven with the material gathered.
When the investigative phase concluded, authorities prepared a coordinated strike. On 6 October 2026, police launched simultaneous raids in eleven provinces: Adana, Mersin, Antalya, Istanbul, Izmir, Düzce, Balıkesir, Karabük, Bolu, Sakarya, and Afyonkarahisar. The list of provinces shows the geographic spread of the operation, stretching from the Mediterranean coast to northwestern Anatolia.
The detention figure includes everyone taken into custody for questioning, regardless of the eventual judicial decision.
The raids were not limited to a few locations; officers descended on 120 addresses at the same time. The number 120 reflects the scale of the effort, indicating that search warrants were executed in homes, businesses, and possibly hideouts across the region.
The operations began at dawn, a tactical choice meant to increase the chance of catching suspects off guard. Reports describe the actions as simultaneous police raids against the ‘Yıkamacılar’ gang, carried out at the 120 addresses spread over the eleven provinces. The timing and uniformity of the action were intended to prevent any warning from spreading between sites.
Out of the people present at those locations, 106 individuals were detained. Among them was Tolga Hoşgökdelen, who investigators identified as the ringleader of the organization. The detention figure includes everyone taken into custody for questioning, regardless of the eventual judicial decision.
While securing the premises, officers seized a variety of items. Numerous firearms were recovered, along with quantities of illegal drugs and pieces of body armor. In addition, authorities took control of real estate and vehicles. The combined value of the confiscated property was stated as 20,500,000 Turkish lira, a sum described as “millions of liras” in the reports.
These seizures serve two purposes: they remove tools that could be used for further criminal acts and they provide tangible evidence that can be presented in court.
Of the 106 suspects held after the raids, the judicial process distinguished between those who would remain in custody and those who would be released under certain conditions. The court ordered the arrest of 73 individuals. This group explicitly included Tolga Hoşgökdelen, confirming his role as a central figure in the investigation.
The remaining 33 detainees were not sent to prison; instead, they were released under judicial control. Judicial control typically involves measures such as regular reporting to a court, travel restrictions, or other obligations meant to ensure compliance while awaiting further proceedings.
The outcome—73 arrested, 33 released under control—matches the numbers given in multiple accounts of the operation. The phrase “remanded in custody” is synonymous with being arrested and held until trial. The decision reflects the judge’s assessment of the evidence linking each suspect to the alleged crimes.
The reports also note that the same 73 suspects, including Tolga Hoşgökdelen, were the ones “taken out” by the court and detained, reinforcing the consistency of the figures across different summaries.
The operation’s scale can be grasped through the repeated numbers that appear in the sources: a sixteen‑month investigation, 117 suspects initially linked to crimes, 120 addresses searched, 11 provinces involved, 106 people detained, 73 arrested, 33 released under control, and 20,500,000 lira in seized assets. Each figure is a discrete data point that together paints a picture of a large‑scale, multi‑province effort to dismantle an armed criminal network.
No further details about subsequent trials or the fate of the seized property are provided in the material. The current standing, therefore, is that the suspects who were remanded remain in custody awaiting trial, those released under control continue to meet their judicial obligations, and the confiscated weapons, drugs, and assets are held as evidence.
In sum, the Adana‑led operation illustrates how a prolonged investigative phase, followed by a synchronized, multi‑regional strike, can lead to significant detentions and asset seizures, with the judicial system ultimately deciding the extent of liberty restrictions for those involved.