On October 29, 2026, Nora Fatehi was formally summoned by Delhi’s Rouse Avenue court to appear as a prosecution witness in a ₹200-crore extortion case tied to Sukesh Chandrasekhar. The accused, charged under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) and IPC Sections 170 (pretending to be a public servant) and 386 (extortion), allegedly defrauded Aditi Singh by impersonating a high-ranking government official. Fatehi was previously questioned by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) regarding her connections to Chandrasekhar and his wife, Leena Maria Paulo. The court's patience had limits—by November 2, her absence prompted sharp criticism: “Her conduct is not up to the mark. Don’t take the court for granted.”
Delhi Police had informed the court that Fatehi had been summoned but lacked information on her attendance. The court’s summons was clear: she was required to testify on November 6. Her lawyers, too, failed to appear despite prior notice, deepening the court’s frustration. The case underscores how legal obligations extend to all, regardless of fame.
Chandrasekhar’s charges stem from allegations of organized fraud. Under MCOCA, he faces severe penalties for crimes like extortion and impersonation. The ₹200-crore figure reflects the scale of the alleged deception—Aditi Singh’s alleged loss through false pretenses. While Fatehi’s exact role remains unclear, her testimony is part of the proceedings. The court’s warning serves as a reminder: legal processes demand compliance, even from those in the public eye.
Under MCOCA, he faces severe penalties for crimes like extortion and impersonation.