In the early hours of 2026-10-20, law enforcement moved against the Milas Municipality in Muğla as part of an investigation into alleged bribery and rigging of public tenders. The operation was carried out under warrants issued by the Muğla Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, which had authorized detention for 35 individuals suspected of involvement in the scheme.
The detention warrants specifically listed Milas Mayor Fevzi Topuz and his son Doruk Topuz among the 35 people for whom arrest was sought. The inclusion of the mayor and his immediate family highlighted the focus of the probe on municipal leadership.
Although the investigation centred on Muğla, the operational reach extended to 13 different provinces. The Muğla-centered operations spanned these jurisdictions as part of the overall investigation into municipal irregularities.
According to the case file, the total face value of the forged tender documents amounted to 2 500 000 000 Turkish lira.
When the operations concluded, 29 persons had been detained. This number reflects those who were actually taken into custody out of the 35 for whom detention warrants had been issued by the prosecutor's office.
The early morning operation was conducted as part of an investigation into allegations of bribery and rigging tenders. The Muğla Chief Public Prosecutor's Office initiated the enforcement actions to address the alleged corruption within municipal operations.
The investigation revealed that fake tender documents were used to issue Work Experience Certificates to various companies. These forged papers formed a central component of the ongoing probe into the municipality.
According to the case file, the total face value of the forged tender documents amounted to 2 500 000 000 Turkish lira. This figure quantifies the scale of the alleged deception in monetary terms.
The investigation traced the false paperwork to 34 distinct companies. These entities were identified in connection with the fake tender documents uncovered during the investigation.
Out of the fabricated tender process, 33 Work Experience Certificates were generated. Each certificate represents an instance where false documentation was issued to the involved companies.
A court‑appointed expert examined the paperwork and concluded that the documents were indeed fake. This expert determination provided a technical basis for the allegations of forgery and fraud.
All raids, searches and detentions were carried out on 2026-10-20.
In the surrounding discourse, Fevzi Topuz and Doruk Topuz have been described critically, reflecting suspicion of wrongdoing. The Muğla Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, by contrast, has been characterized neutrally, indicating that its role is presented as that of an impartial investigator rather than a partisan actor.