Perspectives
Legal · Pakistan

Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani Resigns from Lahore High Court, Citing Concerns Over Judicial Independence

A senior judge's departure from Pakistan's judicial system highlights growing tensions between the executive and the judiciary, raising questions about the future of Pakistan's legal landscape.

Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani Resigns from Lahore High Court, Citing Concerns Over Judicial Independence
Author
Democracy News Live Desk
Date
28 Oct 2026
Read
4 min
The Resignation of Justice Kayani: A Turning Point in Pakistan’s Judiciary

On October 28, 2026, Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, a senior judge of the Lahore High Court, announced his resignation. This move comes at a critical juncture, as it marks the departure of a judge who has served for over 23 years and presided over 26 and 27th constitutional amendments. Justice Kayani's decision to step down is not merely personal but reflects broader concerns about the integrity and independence of Pakistan's judicial institutions.

Coverage
A Judge's Reflections on His Career

Justice Kayani's resignation letter, addressed to President Asif Ali Zardari, is a poignant reflection on his career. In it, he writes, 'These years of judicial service remain among the most meaningful and fulfilling of my life.' He has disposed of over 23,000 cases, a testament to his dedication and the significant impact he has had on the legal landscape. However, the decision to leave the bench was not an easy one.

Concerns Over Judicial Interference

Justice Kayani's primary reason for resigning is his deep-seated concerns about the growing interference of the executive branch in the judiciary. He believes that this interference has compromised the independence and integrity of the high courts. Specifically, he points to the 26th and 27th Constitutional Amendments, which he argues have undermined the autonomy and institutional integrity of Pakistan's high courts.

His departure is seen as a critical moment in the ongoing debate over the independence of the judiciary.

The 26th and 27th Constitutional Amendments

The 26th and 27th Constitutional Amendments are significant in the context of Pakistan's legal history. They introduced substantial changes to the structure and functioning of the judiciary. Justice Kayani argues that these amendments have weakened the judiciary's ability to operate independently, thereby compromising the fairness and impartiality of the legal system. He states, 'in my considered view, the changes introduced through the 26th and 27th Constitutional Amendments have compromised the independence and institutional integrity of the high courts.'

Public Confidence and Judicial Independence

Justice Kayani's resignation is also a reflection of his broader concerns about public confidence in the judiciary. He believes that the executive's growing control over judicial institutions has eroded public trust in judicial fairness. His resignation letter emphasizes this point, stating, 'Such interference has, in my assessment, seriously eroded public confidence in judicial independence and the fairness of the judicial process.'

The Impact on the Legal Profession

Justice Kayani's decision to return to legal practice is a significant development for the legal profession in Pakistan. In his resignation letter, he writes, 'In these circumstances, my conscience does not permit me to continue on the bench. This is a painful decision, but it reflects my conviction that judicial office must remain inseparable from independence, fidelity to the Constitution, and the protection of human dignity.' He adds, 'I, therefore, consider that the time has come for me to lay down my robes and return to legal practice, through which I intend to continue serving the people, protecting their rights, and promoting legal awareness.'

The Broader Context: Tensions Between the Executive and Judiciary

Justice Kayani's resignation is part of a broader trend of tension between the executive and the judiciary in Pakistan. His departure is seen as a critical moment in the ongoing debate over the independence of the judiciary. The growing concerns about executive influence on judicial institutions have sparked widespread discussion about the need to safeguard judicial autonomy. Justice Kayani's own resignation letter emphasizes that judicial office must remain inseparable from independence and fidelity to the Constitution.

Coverage
The Future of Pakistan's Legal Landscape

Justice Kayani's resignation is a stark reminder of the challenges facing Pakistan's legal system. His decision to step down is a statement of principle, highlighting the importance of judicial independence and the need for a robust legal framework that can protect judges from outside influence. As Pakistan grapples with these issues, the future of its legal landscape remains uncertain. Justice Kayani's departure is a powerful symbol of the ongoing struggle for a fair and independent judiciary in Pakistan.

Conclusion

Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani's resignation from the Lahore High Court is a significant event in Pakistan's legal history. It underscores the growing concerns about the independence and integrity of the judiciary, and the need for a robust legal framework that can protect judges from executive interference. As Pakistan continues to navigate these challenges, the fate of its legal system remains in the balance.

← Back to DNL