News · United Kingdom

Derailment Could Have Been Avoided If Drain Built Correctly, Sheriff Finds

Sheriff Lesley Johnston concluded that the 2020 Stonehaven train crash, which killed three, was preventable had a drainage system been constructed to design, exposing failures by Network Rail and Carillion.

Derailment Could Have Been Avoided If Drain Built Correctly, Sheriff Finds
Author
Democracy News Live Desk
Date
4 Nov 2026
Read
2 min

A 2020 train derailment in Stonehaven, Scotland, which claimed the lives of three people, could have been prevented if a drain had been built correctly, according to a sheriff's determination. The drain, constructed in two phases in 2011 and 2012, deviated from the design in several respects, including issues with piping and materials, and the addition of a 'bund' that prevented it from functioning as intended. Network Rail and Carillion were found to have failed in their responsibilities, with Network Rail fined £6.7 million for health and safety failings.

Coverage
The Drainage System: A Critical Failure

The construction of the drainage system began in 2011 and concluded in 2012. However, the project did not adhere to the original design specifications. Specific issues arose with the piping and the materials used. Furthermore, a 'bund' was added to the system. This addition was not part of the intended design and effectively prevented the drain from functioning as it was supposed to. The failure of this infrastructure was a primary factor in the conditions that led to the derailment, as the system could not handle water as intended.

Network Rail and Carillion: Responsibility

The investigation highlighted significant shortcomings by both Network Rail and Carillion. Carillion failed to prepare 'as built' drawings of the finished drain and provide them to Network Rail. Consequently, Network Rail failed to ensure it was in receipt of these drawings, which are essential for verifying that the completed project matches the design. Additionally, Network Rail failed to warn the driver that part of the track was unsafe, a failure that contributed to the severity of the incident. These operational and maintenance gaps underscored the breakdown in communication and oversight between the two entities.

These operational and maintenance gaps underscored the breakdown in communication and oversight between the two entities.

Legal and Financial Ramifications

Network Rail was fined £6.7 million for health and safety failings. This penalty reflects the severity of the organization's failure to maintain safe infrastructure and adhere to statutory duties. The fine serves as a significant financial sanction for the lapses in maintenance and inspection that were identified in the investigation. It highlights the legal consequences of failing to manage safety risks within the railway network.

The Path Forward

The Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) had previously made 20 safety recommendations, though these efforts did not prevent the tragedy. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the need for better preparation of the rail network for extreme weather conditions. Proper adherence to design specifications during construction and rigorous oversight in the maintenance phase are critical. The findings of Sheriff Lesley Johnston emphasize that preventable accidents stem from deviations in construction and failures in procedural checks. The railway industry must ensure that such oversights do not recur, prioritizing the integrity of infrastructure like drainage systems to protect lives.

← Back to DNL