The aircraft involved was IndiGo flight 6E6115, an Airbus A321neo operating the Delhi‑Chennai sector. The flight number 6E6115 is the specific identifier used by the airline for this service. On the date of the incident, the plane was en route between India’s capital and its southern metropolitan centre, carrying passengers and crew as scheduled.
During the flight, an electronic device belonging to a passenger caught fire. The event created panic‑filled moments in the cabin. While the exact nature of the device is not specified, the sudden appearance of flames understandably alarmed those on board, triggering a rapid escalation of tension among passengers and crew alike.
The cabin crew acted quickly, using fire extinguishers to intervene against the flames. Their prompt application of the extinguishing equipment helped to bring the fire under control. This action reflects standard emergency training that prepares flight attendants to manage in‑flight hazards such as fires originating from personal electronics.
The airport, serving the Hyderabad metropolitan area, provided the necessary infrastructure for the plane to touch down without further incident.
Following the crew’s efforts, the pilots executed a diversion in line with established safety procedures. They redirected the aircraft toward the nearest suitable airport, which was Rajiv Gandhi International Airport in Hyderabad. The decision to divert is a routine precaution taken when an onboard incident poses a potential risk to flight safety, allowing the aircraft to land and be inspected on the ground.
The aircraft landed safely at Rajiv Gandhi International Airport in Hyderabad on 2026‑10‑11. The airport, serving the Hyderabad metropolitan area, provided the necessary infrastructure for the plane to touch down without further incident. The safe conclusion of the diversion meant that the aircraft and its occupants were no longer exposed to the airborne hazard.
After landing, IndiGo arranged an alternative aircraft to continue the journey of the passengers to their original destination, Chennai. This step ensured that travelers could reach their intended endpoint despite the disruption. The airline’s confirmation of a substitute aircraft highlights its operational contingency planning for such events.
Initial reports indicated that the fire may have originated from a portable charging device, though authorities had not yet confirmed that the specific source was a power bank. The incident underscores the importance of monitoring lithium‑ion batteries and similar energy stores carried by passengers. It also serves as a reminder of the effectiveness of crew training and safety protocols when faced with unexpected in‑flight emergencies.